Coconuts- Eat The Meat, Use The Shell

Coconuts are a superfood when its comes to physical activity- coconut water for example, has all the essential electrolytes your body needs to keep nerves firing and muscles moving. One cup of cocunut water has more potassium than a banana, 15 times more electrolytes than most sports drinks, and also prevents cramping, promote recovery, and re-hydrates the body. Coconut shells are usually discarded, but they are now being used in exercise clothing. Recycled coconut shells are roasted, turning them into activated carbon and they are then combined with polyester fibers to enhance their performance properties. The result: a greener, softer, quick-drying apparel that provides both UV and odour protection.

Drink Your Coffee, Wear Your Coffee

A cup of coffee before my workout definitely gives me the energy boost I need- in fact a new study suggest that caffeine also kills some of the pain of athletic exertion. Now coffee has another use- the usually wasted ground coffee beans are being infused into the thread of fabrics.  The Coffee grounds are perfect for sports apparel because they control moisture, absorb odour, and are most often concentrated in sports bra’s cups.

Wearable Corn- Grill It, Wear It

Freshly picked corn-on-the-cob is often synonymous with summer- loaded with many essential nutrients including dietary fibre and vitamin C, corn is a summertime BBQ staple. Corn however, is not only great on the grill- it is now being used in exercise clothing. Using corn in fabric is not only environmentally friendly but the fibres wick away sweat and increase sun protection. Also, as your body temperature rises, the fibres let in cool air and post work-out they retain heat.

These active ingrediants are good for you and the environment too.

The supply chain for products we use is something that has undergone rigorous analysis and innovations that have resulted in improved efficiencies, but what about the “removal chain”?  Could a better understanding of what happens to products after we use them promote behavioral change and encourage people to make more sustainable decisions about what they consume and how it affects the world around them?

A team of researchers from MIT SENSEable City Lab (http://senseable.mit.edu/) recently embarked on a major project called Trash Track, which aims to get people thinking about what they throw away and how it impacts the environment. Like an urban equivalent of nuclear medicine–where a tracer is injected and followed through the human body, the project uses custom-designed electronic tags to track different types of waste on their final journeys through the disposal systems of New York and Seattle. Waste Management and Qualcomm funded the study.

The project’s objective is to reveal the disposal process of everyday objects and highlight potential inefficiencies in the recycling and sanitation systems. In mid-July, Trash Track enlisted volunteers in New York and Seattle, who allowed 3000 pieces of their trash to be electronically tagged with special wireless markers or “trash tags”. Working with Waste Management, the SENSEable City Lab team is monitoring the path of trash in real-time using the tags, which report data to a central server at MIT, where it is processed and visualized into dynamic maps showing a slice of the city’s waste stream.

Trash Track was initially inspired by the Green NYC Initiative, the goal of which is to increase the rate of waste recycling in New York to almost 100% by 2030. Currently only about 30% of the city’s waste is diverted from landfills for recycling.

This week, the preliminary results of Trash Track are being unveiled in two new exhibitions in New York and Seattle. For more information, visit http://senseable.mit.edu/trashtalk/index/php

And once they are on, there’s no guaranteeing they’ll stay on; within seconds, wiping or washing can erase a parent’s best efforts and force another round with the little champ. Even more frustrating than that, sometimes the very act of trying to care for your child is risky: many skin care products sold for babies and children contain an alarming amount of carcinogens, toxins and allergens.

Crayola Rainbow Skin Care takes the fight and fear out of kids’ skin care and puts fun in their place. Designed in collaboration with a panel of leading child physicians, medical herbalists, ayurvedic practitioners, naturopathic dermatologists and cosmeticians, this 100% natural, organic and waterproof line of draw-able skin care products relieves pain and irritation caused by the most common childhood crises, including: scrapes, bruises, chicken pox, eczema, bug bites, sunburn, sunscreen, diaper rash and, of course, those invisible boo-boos.

Case Study: Chicken Pox Party
It’s inevitable, when one child gets the chicken pox, they all get them. This can be a pint size epidemic for childcare centers. Rainbow Skin Care is easily the one and only upside to a daycare full itchy-scratchy munchkins. Turn it into an arts and crafts task. Kids can paint themselves, color each other and let their creativity run wild while soothing their itchy skin. The possibilities are endless. This could expand into a daily painting session with sunscreen before they head outside to play.  Pool-parties where the kids actually want to come out of the water to be painted wonderful (and protective) colors. Little league games that seem to always result in scrapes and tears, can now be filled with players sporting their team colors on their skin. Bug bites and bruises are no longer to be feared thanks to Rainbow Skin Care. Natural, creative juice.

• Sure I’m upset that the smug not-so-genius bar told me the problem was my fault.
  [Poor Customer Service]
• Sure I’ll have to spend 30 minutes on the phone negotiating to fix the problem with Apple Care – who, from all accounts is basically useless unless you push them to the edge. (As an aside, I’ve seen Dell’s warranty program in action – next day product replacement – no questions asked) [Poor Product Support]
• Sure Apple’s being irresponsible by not owning up to this obvious manufacturing defect and at the end of the day, I may need to shell out $800+labor+tax for a new screen[Poor Corporate Policy]

But to top it off, this issue exposes such a fundamental design flaw in the Mac Air that they are unwilling to take responsibility for [Poor Product Design]. Oh Apple – can your ego really be that inflated you can do no wrong?

Let’s have a look at Apple’s environmental policy taken from their site:

“Protecting the environment is critical to the conservation of precious natural resources and the continued health of our planet. Apple recognizes its responsibility as a global citizen and continually strives to reduce the environmental impact of the work we do and the products we create.”

The way this laptop is designed, this little hing issue requires a complete replacement of the LCD screen. This one design flaw, negates all their talk about lower carbon emissions. Cradle-to-Cradle? More like Cradle-to-Dump. The back half of the life cycle hasn’t even been considered. This is not environmentally sustainable. Another highlight from their history of environmental achievements:

“In 2008 MacBook Air is the first product to use mercury-free back light technology with arsenic-free LCD display glass.”

Great – so when my perfectly functional screen ends up in the dump, at least there won’t be any mercury leaking into the soil. Who thought it was a good idea to attach a constantly moving part to a major (expensive) part of the computer? This machine needs to be redesigned. Message to the industrial designers at Apple – think, prototype, build and test before you send your machines into the market. While some have had their airs fixed with a brand new screen, and others have put knives through theirs,

to save one more perfectly perfectly good LCD from ending up in the Apple graveyard, you’ll find my air fashionably affixed with duct tape.

Thank you Apple.

1. It’s just good business to be sustainable Reducing consumption is good for business and good for the environment. Dell is walking the talk with reductions in waste from manufacturing process and packaging. Mattel has reduced unnecessary packaging by redesigning the boxes that toys come in – no longer do they use the little plastic twist ties. Barbie and Ken are held in place by pop out cardboard slits made in the external box.

2. Customers drive requirements
Listening to consumers and solving consumer’s problems came across as the number one priority. Consumers vote for business practice with the dollars they spend. Organizations can use this basic premise to do two things. 1/ Redesign products and services that don’t meet consumer needs from a quality, price and sustainability standpoint. 2/ Look for those needs that are unmet, unarticulated and underserved and solve for x. This is where true consumer innovation takes place.

3. The reduction of risk is a key consideration in any operation – service or manufacturing
77% of Starbucks coffee is procured from free trade sources. While they spend a more for their green coffee, the reduction of supply risk is factored into the business model. Going with a cheaper source doesn’t guarantee translation to the bottom line if there is risk that the source will be cut off. Ben & Jerry’s mission of social and economic justice is well known. They have been a model for sustainability with their cow to cup philosophy. Neither company has sacrificed quality with their practices and as premium brands, can command higher price points from consumers.

Smart companies will find ways to weave sustainability into their operations – inherently lowering cost and delivering consumers economic and experiential value.

Think about some of these statistics presented by Jez Frampton of Interbrand at the opening plenary tonight:

• 95% of consumers say they would consider buying green products
• 25% actually do buy green products
• 45% purposefully don’t

Look at that last statistic. Why would a person choose NOT to buy a product that is better for the environment? Is there intent to destroy our planet? No – I would venture that consumers have been disappointed by green products – they have either performed worse and are more expensive. That is not a sustainable strategy – especially in our bleak economic times. Firms producing products and services must understand that consumers expectations are high. Recycled tissue shouldn’t irritate my nose. Environmentally friendly detergent must clean my clothes as well. It’s just not good enough to slap a “green” label on products and services and expect it to be a differentiator on its own.

To appeal with the masses, sustainable products and services MUST offer the same standards as other products. Quality, performance and price come first – sustainable, green, environmental friendliness are added benefits and eventually, should be a given. The economics of sustainability must align with a consumer’s personal economics and value. Some examples for sustainable experiences include:

1. Cleaning products made from all natural ingredients found in the home (baking soda and vinegar)
2. Small living spaces
3. Local, in season produce
4. Car sharing and car pooling

There are so many ways consumers can choose to be sustainable AND economical. Today, I rented a car to drive down from San Francisco to Monterey. I’d reserved a compact car for cost and fuel efficiency. The person at the counter told me I could get a hybrid car that was slightly larger, more comfortable and give me better the mileage than the compact – all for $4 more. It was a no brainer – the experience value of the hybrid far outweighed that of the compact car.

Sustainability simply must be sustainable economically to gain traction. Green energy must become cheaper, better and more available than fossil fuel energy. Green manufacturing must produce a quality product that rivals non-green product. Green service must be just as good as non-green service. There will always be a segment who can afford to choose sustainability – but to gain momentum with the general populous, the design of sustainable products and service must take into consideration consumer needs and expectations to service demand in a responsible way.

How do we make the 4Ps of working in harmony? People, Planet, Purpose and Profit is rapidly becoming the new mantra of a new generation of managers, they are now challenged as never before to deal with a myriad of issues that go far beyond creating shareholder value. What good is shareholder value when we are selling our future short? What good is shareholder value when there are no jobs? Some argue that outsourcing to some lower cost countries can help a company to make money. When there are no jobs, there won’t be any pension funds to provide capital for these corporations? When we run out of natural resources there won’t be any customer or markets.

The 4Ps are the framework for a more sustainable world. Corporations are beginning to understand the importance of adopting this new “sustainability” business paradigm—one that focuses on creating a better balance between social, environmental and economic factors for short- and long-term performance. Innovation is not creating more products that no one wants or brand extensions that only the brand managers understand. Innovation needs to be about new business models; new partnerships and new social behavior.

Unfortunately, our economic system is not designed that way. How can a “sustainable” business climate ever be possible in a quick return capital driven economic system? Do we continue to reward those who design and manufacture products that only serve the purpose of making money at all costs or laughing at those who design “green” products that are no more than a quick green wash?

We need to start at the shareholders level. Here’s a story. When Jeff Bezos was addressing shareholders in Amazon’s annual shareholder meeting this week, the sustainability issue was raised. They questioned some of Amazon’s business seemed not very eco-friendly. It’s an online retail company that sell products with lots of extra packaging to prevent breakage and it relies on delivery trucks to deliver to people’s homes, but Bezos was well prepared and he was quick to highlight the company’s greener side:

First, he said, consumers will drive a 2,000-pound car to buy a 5-pound item from a brick-and-mortar store. “It’s much more efficient to use a full truck to drop off packages than when everyone does point to point delivery,” he said, noting that delivery trucks use an optimized route.

Second, Amazon’s investment in the Kindle – and it is indeed still in investment phase, he confirmed – is one that could lead to less paper printed later on.

Third, Amazon unveiled “frustration-free” packaging last fall that eliminates the need for dozens of wire ties and hard plastic encasements.

And finally, Amazon has dubbed hundreds of employees as “Earth Kaizens” who identify waste and look for more energy-efficient practices. As a result of the Kazien recommendations, Bezos said, the company eliminated light bulb in its food vending machines company-wide, saving $20,000 per year on energy costs.

Bezos was giving a lot of funny one-liners during the meeting, I’ve seen him doing that in the past. When he was talking about his company’s philosophy versus that of his competitors, he threw out “Advertising is the price you pay for having an unremarkable product or service…” That is a great one.

Sustainability is a wicked problem, with high energy and food prices, the debate about biofuels, water stress, agricultural subsidies, deforestation, and environmental degradation is proving too difficult for anyone to handle. The short-sightedness of governments and big institutions continue to push us down the wrong path.

As for businesses, we need to stop thinking more products. Let’s think better products. Better means products that are socially responsible. It starts with planning, not with marketing. Decisions such as what to make, where and when to make it and where to locate inventory are focused on profit or revenue maximization,, it needs to extend to include carbon emissions and exploring options to educate the customer to participate, even if it means doing more work. I think consumers are happy to do that provided we can put a compelling case together. This is the future of business. As least I hope it is the case.

At Idea Couture, we speak often about consumers’ needs – unarticulated and unmet. These exhibits bring to the front of consciousness these needs in a raw, ‘in your face’ way. Who wouldn’t want the elixirs and cures filled with promises? As I head to Monterey for Sustainability Brands 09, I ponder questions about the human condition and what it will take to satisfy our subconscious, ego and superego in a way that is sustainable.

To check out Flow Market go to http://theflowmarket.com.