
Progressive Change.
In a discussion about improvisational jazz, a teacher of mine once expressed, “the only constant thing in life is change,” paraphrasing the greek philosopher Heraclitus. That phrase remains meaningful to me fifteen years later, complementing my general fascination with progress.
I deeply enjoy progress. That may sound very vague, but it’s true. I enjoy learning and gaining new skills, whether it’s a new instrument or a programming language. I love progressive music (Tool, Yes, Dream Theater, etc.) and I pay for Progressive car insurance (just kidding – I’m with Belair Direct). I enjoy working towards Checkmate as much as I enjoy working through a Rubik’s Cube. I get excited by Darwin, Stephen Jay Gould and Bill Hicks’ rambling of “how we’re going to get to Mars.” I just love progress.
There is nobody more excited by progressive change as Ray Kurzweil. Like many others, when I first read Kurzweil’s The Singularity is Near in 2006, I felt a real exhilaration as if I had just cracked open the coolest fortune cookie of all time. Unite my consciousness with a supercomputer so I can exist throughout all eternity?? Sure, sign me up!
For those who are unfamiliar with Kurzweil’s Singularity, I strongly recommend delving into it. It’s worth checking out. Info on Ray can be found here, his book here, the upcoming movie here, and the supporting organization here. You may also be interested in TED videos here and here.

Exponential Growth.
Kurzweil observes that change is abound, and moving quickly in a particular direction. Vast and diverse occurrences of exponential growth transcend technological paradigms, perpetually driving us forward. Just in case you’re skeptical of such claims, here’s an excerpt from the book’s Wikipedia article, citing just some of the exponentially growing technologies:
- Dynamic RAM size (smallest feature sizes decreasing exponentially)
- Dynamic RAM price performance (improving exponentially)
- Average Transistor price (decreasing exponentially)
- Transistor Manufacturing costs (decreasing exponentially)
- Microprocessor clock speeds (increasing exponentially)
- Microprocessor costs (decreasing exponentially)
- Transistors per microprocessor (increasing exponentially)
- Processor performance (increasing exponentially)
- DNA sequencing costs per base pair (decreasing exponentially)
- Random Access Memory bits per dollar (increasing exponentially)
- Magnetic data storage bits per dollar (increasing exponentially)
- Wireless Internet and phone services price performance (increasing exponentially)
- Number of Internet hosts (increasing exponentially)
- Bytes of Internet traffic (increasing exponentially)
- Internet backbone bandwidth (increasing in a very terraced, quasi-exponential manner)
- Mechanical device sizes (decreasing exponentially)
- Number of scientific citations for nanotechnology research (increasing exponentially)
- Number of U.S. nanotech patents (increasing exponentially)
Growth, growth, growth. Now add a little more growth for good measure. Pun intended.
Our data pools are growing rapidly as well. I remember the excitement years ago when I upgraded my 386 laptop with 80 megabytes of disk space. Well, last night I caught myself cursing at my home computer for its pathetic 2.4 terabytes of space. (Note to self: buy more space.) Things have changed, clearly. We have oceans of digital assets at our fingertips and we constantly apply a myriad of operations upon them.

What really interests me, however, is not the fact that we have more of anything (or everything), but the idea that we can potentially do more with what we have. As any good statistician will tell you: more data is not better data. But more data when intelligently analyzed, probed, manipulated and mastered can be extraordinary data.
This brings me to the promise of the Petabyte Age. The petabyte is a unit of information or computer storage equal to one quadrillion bytes, or 1000 terabytes:
1 PB = 1,000,000,000,000,000 or 1015 bytes.
Translation: A lot of data. That’s about 250 trillion MP3 downloads from iTunes, 1.5 billion DivX Movies, or 100 billion 20 megapixel superfine photographs.
One year ago, Chris Anderson – the editor of Wired Magazine who is often (understandably) mistaken for the curator of the beloved TED conference – wrote an article called “The End of Theory” in his widely cherished magazine. He wrote of emerging opportunities and trends that will result from immense data compilations and subsequent manipulations. Here is a short excerpt from the article, where Anderson explains some fundamentals of this upcoming “Petabyte Age”:
The Petabyte Age is different because more is different. Kilobytes were stored on floppy disks. Megabytes were stored on hard disks. Terabytes were stored in disk arrays. Petabytes are stored in the cloud. As we moved along that progression, we went from the folder analogy to the file cabinet analogy to the library analogy to — well, at petabytes we ran out of organizational analogies.
At the petabyte scale, information is not a matter of simple three- and four-dimensional taxonomy and order but of dimensionally agnostic statistics. It calls for an entirely different approach, one that requires us to lose the tether of data as something that can be visualized in its totality. It forces us to view data mathematically first and establish a context for it later. For instance, Google conquered the advertising world with nothing more than applied mathematics. It didn’t pretend to know anything about the culture and conventions of advertising — it just assumed that better data, with better analytical tools, would win the day. And Google was right.
Google operates with a particular philosophy that it applies to virtually all of its activities: spare humans from the burden of tasks that machines are simply better equipped to accomplish. For example, it does not make sense for humans to maintain a dictionary for Google’s seemingly flawless “did you mean _____?” corrective search feature. Google uses pattern recognition to identify (with remarkable accuracy) typographical errors and likely intentions of users. Data knows best. Numbers don’t lie. This is a great example of how data – and intelligent manipulation of data – can drive useful solutions.

Lest we forget, questions precede answers.
Depending on data for answers makes an awful lot of sense when [a] there’s enough of it and [b] we’re equipped to extract meaning from it. Anderson suggests that we should also depend on data to derive the questions. This intrigues me deeply. As a business strategist, technologist and experience designer, I have tremendous respect for the process of asking the right questions. Idris is an exemplary role model of this practice. He often reminds me to not only leave the assumed answers at the door, but the questions as well. While fundamental, it is often overlooked and deserves to be emphasized.
Rather than trying to figure out how to sell more product, let’s re-examine if this product is really what people want. More interestingly, is it what people need? Rather than innovating upon an existing service, let’s make sure that the goals provide meaning and utility.
Pehaps the data-driven insights of the Petabyte Age will teach us that we are moving in the wrong direction on several fronts that we assume to be natural, safe and promising. Perhaps data-driven questions will produce answers that will provide real and lasting enlightenment.
Get ready for the revolution with an open mind.
There are a lot of ideas in this post (hence “Part I”). The topics mentioned are broad and complex, and there’s no way I can do justice to them through a series of blog posts. The links and notions presented here provide a decent starting point for those interested in pursuing these topics further. There’s no right way to end this post but to express the intrinsic purpose behind its composition.
My goal is to stimulate mere awareness and support for any enthusiasm surrounding these important ideas. As a champion of progress and someone who longs to witness the materialization of the petabyte-promised innovations of the future, I feel a duty to tickle the collective interest and generate some excitement for the opportunities on the not-so-distant horizon.
You can be sure that future posts will be more focused on specific implications of the Petabyte Age, tackling a broad spectrum of fields that include education, healthcare, art, consumerism and culture.
For now, enjoy some of the links provided above and keep an open mind for the progressive future that awaits us all.
As always, thanks for reading.
AMR
Continue here…
Anything Is Possible: Embracing the Petabyte Age, Part II

Post a comment